Are Some Firearms Inevitably Unnecessary? Debunking Myths and Safeguarding Communities

The Myths Surrounding Unnecessary Guns

In discussions on firearm ownership, there is often a debate around the idea of unnecessary firearms. Some argue that even firearms that are broken beyond repair still pose risks when left in circulation. This viewpoint was famously addressed in another piece, which posited that a broken firearm still has potential utility for parts and is not entirely without value. While this is true from a technical standpoint, it is crucial to address the broader implications of keeping such firearms in or near communities.

Nonfunctional and Salvageable Firearms

Those firearms that are nonfunctional and beyond repair are indeed more than mere parts sources. In many cases, these firearms pose a significant risk if they are not properly disposed of. There have been instances where individuals have been injured or worse attempting to repair or fire firearms that have been disassembled due to known issues or decommissioning. It is essential to ensure that any damaged firearm is properly scrapped to prevent accidental injuries or misuse.

The Vandalization of Firearms: Decommissioning

Another interesting practice is the intentional vandalism of firearms, often referred to as decommissioning. This process involves rendering the firearm nonfunctional while still appearing outwardly intact. These decommissioned firearms can be extremely dangerous, as they can be handled and manipulated, leading to bad habits and potentially disastrous outcomes. The fact that such vandalized firearms can still be cocked, have slides that can be retracted, and have cylinders that can turn but cannot take a cartridge poses a significant risk to those who might handle them without proper training.

The Role of Training

Training firearms should be clearly distinguishable from their functioning counterparts to prevent confusion and ensure safety. Some manufacturers produce solid polymer models of popular firearms that are distinctly colored and weighted to ensure that they are easily recognizable. However, even these models should be clearly marked as training guns to avoid any risk of accidental discharge.

A Case Study: A Dangerous SMLE Enfield

One particularly alarming example involved an SMLE Enfield that a customer brought in for examination. The seller had boasted about the rifle's accuracy and performance, but a close inspection of the action revealed that the chamber had been drilled through at two points and plugged with brass brazing rods. Someone had then drilled through these rods, making it possible to force a cartridge into the chamber with effort. If the customer had successfully chambered a live round, the consequences could have been lethal. This case highlights the need for thorough vetting and proper disposal of decommissioned firearms.

Conclusion: The Importance of Proper Disposal

While some might argue that decommissioned firearms can still be useful, the risks associated with their continued existence in communities far outweigh any potential benefit. Ensuring that such firearms are properly scrapped and preventing their misuse or accidental discharge is crucial for public safety. Handling these firearms without proper training can lead to tragic outcomes, and it is important to maintain clear distinctions between functioning and training firearms to safeguard those who might encounter them.