Are Tanning Beds Really Safer Than Before?

Commercial use of tanning beds has been banned in Australia for health reasons for a few years now, and that is a good indicator of the risks associated with these devices. The belief that tanning beds have become safer over time is a misconception often perpetuated by the industry. However, evidence and expert opinions suggest that tanning beds remain a significant health hazard, particularly when it comes to skin cancer.

Risk Assessment: Tanning Beds and Skin Cancer

It's crucial to understand that tanning beds are not safe, regardless of the regulations or safety measures implemented. Scientific studies have shown that ultraviolet (UV) radiation, whether from the sun or artificial tanning lamps, increases the risk of skin cancer. Tanning beds emit UV radiation, which is the primary cause of skin damage and cancer. Health authorities, including those in Australia, have taken steps to ban their use to protect public health.

Why Tanning Beds Are Unsafe

The use of tanning beds significantly increases one's risk of developing skin cancer. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), tanning beds classify UV exposure as a known carcinogen, placing it in the same category as asbestos and tobacco. Even with stringent safety measures, the radiation from tanning beds can penetrate the skin, cause DNA damage, and lead to the development of skin cancer.

Regulations and Safety Measures

Some tanning salons claim that they have implemented safety measures to reduce the risks. These measures may include skin assessments, age restrictions, and time limits, but they do not negate the harmful effects of UV radiation.

Skin Assessments and Customer Tracking

Many tanning salons now conduct skin assessments and track customer usage. For example, if a customer has fair skin, they might be started at a very low exposure level and gradually increase the exposure over time. Additionally, age restrictions and wait periods between sessions are common, designed to prevent excessive and harmful UV exposure. However, these measures only delay the inevitable risk and do not eliminate it.

Technology and Safety

Modern tanning beds often come equipped with computer systems that regulate exposure time and automatically shut off when the allotted time is up. While this technology can be useful in preventing acute burning, it does not address the underlying health risks associated with UV radiation. The controlled environment of a tanning bed is still a form of UV exposure that can lead to long-term skin damage and cancer.

Alternative Sun Exposure

To achieve the desired tan and maintain healthy skin, consider alternative methods. Spending a few minutes outdoors in the sun, coupled with the use of protective sunscreens, can provide both a healthy glow and essential vitamin D. Sunscreen with a high SPF can protect the skin from harmful UV rays while still allowing the beneficial effects of sunlight to provide vitamin D synthesis.

My Personal Experience

I have fair skin and have been using tanning beds sparingly. My sessions typically last no more than 10 to 15 minutes, as I do not visit the tanning salon frequently. Vitamin D supplements are now a part of my health routine, as I am less likely to venture into outdoor environments due to allergic reactions. While I try to find a balance, I remain cautious about the long-term effects of UV exposure.

Conclusion

The misconception that tanning beds have become safer over the years is a dangerous one. Despite safety measures and regulations, tanning beds continue to pose a significant health risk, particularly when it comes to skin cancer. The best approach is to seek alternative methods of achieving a healthy glow and maintaining skin health. Sun protection through sunscreen, vitamin D supplements, and cautious outdoor exposure are safer and more effective ways to achieve these goals.