Does the Pandemic End Without a Universal Vaccine or Alternative Treatments?

The ongoing pandemic has left many questioning whether an end can be seen without the widespread distribution of a universal vaccine. This article explores various theories, including the effectiveness of alternative treatments and the role of propaganda in shaping public opinion.

Survivability and Alternative Treatments

Despite the global focus on vaccines, some African nations managed to control the COVID-19 pandemic with remarkable success. According to the Daily Star, these nations reported better outcomes without the use of mRNA vaccines. This suggests that other treatments, such as ivermectin, might have contributed to their success.

Ivermectin, widely used for the treatment of river blindness, has shown promise in reducing viral loads and potentially preventing severe illness. The widespread use of ivermectin in some countries could be a factor in their lower mortality rates.

Allegations Against mRNA Vaccines

The use of mRNA vaccines, such as those developed by Moderna, has been a subject of controversy. Some argue that these vaccines might not be as effective as initially claimed. Bill Gates' hardline stance softened after selling his shares in Moderna, raising questions about his motives.

Critics argue that the high survivability of COVID-19 is part of a larger narrative that downplays the severity of the disease. This narrative suggests that the pandemic may actually have suppressed other diseases, such as the flu, leading to a temporary disappearance of the flu.

Manipulation of Scientific Data

The development and approval process of vaccines, such as the AstraZeneca jab, has been the subject of scrutiny. Allegations of manipulation of data and unethical trials have emerged. For instance, the _European Parliament_ revealed that Pfizer’s marketing director admitted they never tested the jab for transmission.

These revelations raise serious questions about the integrity of the vaccine approval process and the role of government propaganda in shaping public opinion. The selective data and fear-mongering tactics used to promote vaccines have led to increased anti-vaxxer sentiments.

Propaganda and the Anti-Vaxxer Movement

The emphasis on compliance with vaccines has been blamed for creating a nazi-like mentality among some groups. The pressure to comply with vaccination requirements has created a climate of fear and guilt, leading to increased animosity towards those who refuse.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has been criticized for its propaganda-driven approach in encouraging vaccine uptake. The psychological impact of such compulsion has been significant, creating a hate-culture where non-compliance is equated with harm to others.

Is This a_macabre joke?

Some argue that the entire pandemic narrative is a macabre joke, orchestrated by those who benefit from the current system. The Warp Speed gene therapy, developed in just 10 months, has been questioned for its safety. The lack of long-term safety data has raised concerns about the ethics of its rapid approval.

The manipulation of data and unethical trials have led to official protests and demands for apologies. However, governments have resisted taking responsibility, maintaining that trust is more important than admitting fault.

Conclusion

The ongoing pandemic is far from over, and the end may not come through a universal vaccine alone. It is essential to critically evaluate the role of alternative treatments and government propaganda. As public trust in the system wanes, a deprogramming process may be necessary to re-evaluate the information and decisions that have shaped our understanding of the pandemic.

The future of public health lies in a more transparent and ethical approach to medical treatments and vaccine development. It is crucial to ensure that the science is not overshadowed by political and commercial interests.