Introduction

In one of the episodes of the critically acclaimed medical drama, 'Chicago Med', the character of Will goes against a patient's wishes to not be resuscitated. This decision highlights the complex ethical challenges faced by medical professionals and the tension between personal judgment and hospital protocols.

Context and Characters

The scene in question revolves around Jennifer Baker, a patient diagnosed with end-stage Lymphoma who had expressed a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order. However, Will, one of the lead characters in the show, disregards her instruction and makes a critical decision that puts the entire lawsuit scenario into motion.

Key Points and Ethical Considerations

1. Will's Motivation: During the episode, Jennifer is brought to the hospital after fainting while walking. Her husband, desperate to try a potentially life-saving treatment, pushes Will to bypass hospital protocols and try unconventional methods. Will, feeling empathy for both Jennifer and her father, decides to take matters into his own hands. However, his actions are driven by his ambition to save everyone, rather than adherence to professional ethical standards.

2. Legal and Professional Consequences: In real-life medical practice, making a decision contrary to a patient's wishes, especially when there is a valid DNR order, can have severe legal and professional repercussions. Will could face disciplinary action, including termination and potential loss of his medical license, and this decision could result in a lawsuit. The show dramatizes the tension between a physician's moral and ethical obligations and the legal requirements they must uphold.

Impact on the Episode and Series

3. Dramatic Tension and Character Development: The incident significantly adds to the narrative tension of the episode, making it more engaging for the audience. While the episode concludes with Jennifer's death, her husband's gratitude to Will underscores that the intentions behind the actions were pure. This ethical dilemma serves as a crucial moment for character development, highlighting the moral complexities inherent in the medical profession.

4. Ethical Dilemma in Real Life: In reality, whether such a scenario would play out similarly is uncertain. Medical ethics typically advocate for patient autonomy, informed consent, and the honor of a DNR order. Bypassing such directives without proper authorization would be highly unethical and unlawful. However, the intense emotional and moral stakes of not trying to save a patient's life can be a compelling scenario for dramatizing medical dramas.

Conclusion

The episode explores the grey areas of medical ethics and the ethical dilemmas faced by medical practitioners. Will's decision, although well-intentioned, raises important questions about the balance between professional duty and personal judgment. Such ethical dilemmas underscore the critical need for medical professionals to adhere to strict protocols to ensure patient care adheres to both legal and ethical standards.

Key Takeaways: The scenario highlights the importance of hospital protocols, the need for informed consent, and the complex ethical challenges faced by medical professionals in real-life medical practice.