Exploring Alternative Self-Identification in Dissociative Identity Disorder

When it comes to Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), the way individuals self-identify can be quite diverse, ranging from the commonly used “DID” to more personalized terminology such as “alters.” This article delves into why some individuals who suffer from DID might identify themselves as their alters rather than self-reporting as having DID. We will explore the nuances of this phenomenon, providing insights based on first-hand experiences and theories from the field of psychology.

Understanding DID and Alters

DID, or Dissociative Identity Disorder, is a complex condition involving two or more distinct identity or personality states. These different states, often referred to as 'alters,' can be recognized by unique behaviors, ways of perceiving the world, and sometimes even different physical appearances.

One person discussing this condition is Cole. Cole is not the core alter; Cole is identifiable as a separate and distinct identity from the core alter, Rose, Lucas, Kimberly, and James. Cole explains, “I am Cole and none of the others.” This distinction is crucial in understanding the individuality and separateness of each alter within a DID system.

Labeling and Terminology

The language one uses to describe their DID journey can be deeply personal and meaningful. Some people with DID prefer terms like ‘houses’ and ‘alters’ to DID or ‘host.’ For example, Cole mentions, “I have never heard someone say that they ‘house’ alters.” This language choice reflects a more inclusive and less stigmatizing approach to describing the coexistence of multiple identities within a single individual.

Dr. John Smith, a prominent psychologist specializing in DID, notes, “Language is a powerful tool for self-expression and personal empowerment. People with DID often find that using terms like ‘alters’ instead of ‘DID’ helps them feel validated and less alienated.”

Factors Influencing Self-Identification

Healthy Multiplicity

It's important to acknowledge that not all multiplicity is inherently pathological. Individuals with healthy multiplicity often experience multiple personalities as a positive and fulfilling part of their identity. They may not view themselves as having a 'disorder' since they don't experience the problematic symptoms associated with DID.

Smith continues, “There are systems that have healed from collective trauma and have developed robust internal communication channels. Such systems may choose not to attempt fusion into a single identity or may even resist it, viewing their multiplicity as a secure and comfortable way of living.”

Lack of Official Diagnosis

Another factor influencing self-identification is the lack of official diagnosis. In some countries, the diagnostic process can be lengthy and challenging, leading people to consider terms like ‘alters’ more appealing than the formal term ‘DID.’

Speaking from personal experience, Cole states, “Some systems might not opt for the diagnosis ‘DID’ because the process is too long, or they are unsure. Instead, they prefer to use terms like ‘alters’ that they feel better represent their reality without the added administrative burden.”

Personal Preference and Stigma

Ultimately, the choice of terminology is deeply personal. Some individuals with DID might find that terms like ‘alters’ are more empowering and less stigmatizing than ‘DID.’ This is not just about language but about how one sees and feels about themselves.

Cole concludes, “Some systems just might not like the label ‘DID’ or find it unhelpful. So, they opt for another way of expressing their plurality, and this can vary between the alters within a system too.”

Conclusion

The way individuals with DID self-identify is a complex and deeply personal matter. Whether they use the term ‘DID’ or prefer terms like ‘alters,’ it is important to recognize that these choices reflect a desire for authenticity and empowerment. As our understanding of DID evolves, so too will the language we use to describe and validate these unique experiences.