Gun Owners and Vape Smoke: A Controversial Confrontation

Every once in a while, a situation arises that sparks heated discussions on social media and in public forums. One such scenario that often divides opinions is the interaction between a vape smoker and a gun owner. In this contentious situation, what would a gun owner's reaction be if someone were to blow smoke from their vape in their face due to all the gun crime?

The age-old question of who would react in what way to such a scenario has been a topic of debate. Braydon Page has dived into this subject with a series of humorous and thought-provoking statements, shedding light on different perspectives.

Braydon Page’s Perspective

Braydon Page's responses touch on various aspects of this interaction. For instance, he suggests that if a gun owner were told this scenario, they would most probably look at the smoker and say:

"I hope your insurance is paid up"

While this statement is humorous, it also hints at the potential consequences of such an action—financial and legal penalties.

Further elaboration on this statement reveals a slightly less humorous take:

You're lucky that current medical science will be able to remove your vape from your ass no matter how far up there he jams it!

Here, Braydon emphasizes the discomfort and potential medical issues the smoker might face, adding to the absurdity of the situation.

Realistic Consequences

However, Braydon goes beyond the humorous aspects and delves into more serious scenarios, discussing the actual physical and legal outcomes:

You'd likely find out how much it really sucks to get throat punched and not be able to breath, of course the secondary waffle stomping of your balls might also become a concern. At least no guns would be involved.

Braydon points out the physical violence that could ensue, making the initial action even more extreme. He also cleverly absolves the gun owners from further involvement, adding a touch of humor to the potential violence.

Gun Owner's Perspective

Braydon also addresses the perspective of the gun owner:

Well genius, the entire purpose of vapes is that they don't emit smoke. You're inhaling water vapor. A gun owner might laugh at you or he might give you the beat down that your dad should have given you choose that gun owner wisely.

Here, Braydon satirizes the situation, implying that the gun owner would either find humor in the situation or react with extreme violence, leaving the choice to the smoker to pick a more reasonable gun owner.

Legal Consequences and Assault

The situation can also be viewed from a legal perspective. Braydon sheds light on the potential legal actions that could arise from such an incident:

Well that's either assault or battery depending on the jurisdiction so probably by having you arrested. Maybe you'd get lucky and they'd be able to get the rumor going in lock-up that you're a kiddy-diddler.

Braydon highlights the legal ramifications, suggesting that the smoker could be charged with assault or battery, leading to potential arrest and even rumor-fueled labeling.

Personal Reflections

Braydon's post concludes with a personal reflection, challenging the dynamics of the situation:

First off, I would ignore your moronic attempt. Question: Why is it every time some whimp ass moron who is afraid of guns their first action is an attempt to create some kind of stupid violence I thought they wanted peace.

Gun owner or not, if you were a man, I might be inclined to punch you in the face if you were to blow smoke in my face. If you were a woman, I might have some choice words for you but I would not harm you as I believe it's wrong to assault a woman.

I can only answer for me. The punishment must fit the crime. In this case I would hit him once for each offense while asking him to stop. If I had to do it more than twice, I would stop his ability to smoke.

Braydon's final statements emphasize the importance of exercising restraint and the need for appropriate responses. He criticizes the initial action of the vape smoker and suggests that the punishment should be proportional to the offense.