Introduction

The recent hostage crisis involving Hamas in Israel has brought to light a contentious issue: whether the treatment of hostages aligns with Islamic teachings. This article aims to dissect the claims made by Hamas and compare them with the principles of Islam, highlighting the stark differences between words and deeds.

The Convergence of Claims and Reality

Hamas has claimed that they treated the Israeli hostages in accordance with Islamic teachings, emphasizing their purported commitment to preserving the lives and wellbeing of their captives. However, this statement is as deceptive as it is concerning, given the established principles of Islam and the reported treatment of the hostages.

Firstly, it is important to note that Islamic teachings emphasize mercy and compassion, especially towards those who are innocent, including children, the elderly, and women. Practices such as the keeping of sex-slaves, torture, and beheading are diametrically opposed to these principles. These acts are neither humanitarian nor in line with Islamic ethics.

Islamic teachings indeed encourage converting non-believers to Islam. However, when this is not possible, it is not to kill them; instead, the non-believers should be respected and treated well as long as they do not pose a threat. The harsh and inhumane treatment of hostages, such as branding with hot exhaust pipes, is not only against Islamic teachings but also a gross violation of moral and ethical standards.

The Gap Between Words and Deeds

The discrepancy between Hamas's deceptive claims and their actions is stark and undeniable. The treatment of the hostages, including the Bibas family and others, has been described as inhumane and cruel. Reports indicate that some hostages were treated fairly well, while others faced severe torture and dehumanizing treatment. Such actions not only violate humanitarian laws but also contradict the fundamental principles of Islam.

The report suggests that some hostages, including children, were made to watch videos of horrific atrocities committed by Hamas. This is not only a traumatic experience for the hostages but also a violation of their rights and dignity. Additionally, some hostages like the 84-year-old Alma Avraham were denied necessary medicine during their captivity, a clear breach of moral and medical ethics.

Conclusion: Lies and Bad PR

The claims made by Hamas about treating hostages in accordance with Islamic teachings are nothing but a elaborate lie. Their actions speak louder than words, revealing a complete disregard for human life and dignity. The global community must remain vigilant and hold Hamas accountable for their actions. These practices not only bring shame to the principles of Islam but also tarnish its image and credibility.

It is crucial to reject the false narratives and recognize the true nature of Hamas's behavior. As the world watches and responds, it is our collective responsibility to advocate for justice and humanity in all our actions.