Interpreters in High-Level Diplomatic Conversations: The Case of Trump and Putin
Interpreters in High-Level Diplomatic Conversations: The Case of Trump and Putin
Introduction
President Trump and President Putin have spoken on the phone multiple times, and the language they use during their conversations can vary. Both leaders are fluent in English, so it is possible that they use English as the primary language for their phone calls. However, they may also use interpreters if they prefer to communicate in their native languages. This article explores the role of interpreters in high-level diplomatic conversations and the significance of their presence during the phone call between Trump and Putin.
Role of Interpreters
Diplomatic conversations are often private, and the details of their discussions are not always publicly disclosed. However, it is common for high-level diplomatic conversations to involve interpreters to ensure clear and accurate communication between the participants. Interpreters play a crucial role in translating messages, ensuring that no information is lost in translation, and that both sides fully understand the content of the discussion.
In the case of Trump and Putin, their language proficiency can vary. While Putin can speak English, it is likely that an interpreter would still be present. The use of an interpreter by Putin in private meetings with other leaders, such as Angela Merkel, despite his fluency in German, highlights the importance of this practice in diplomacy.
Private vs. Public Diplomacy
While some may question the need for interpreters in public discussions, the use of interpreters in private meetings is essential for several reasons. First, interpreters help ensure that no important information is overlooked or misunderstood. Secondly, they provide a tactical advantage, allowing leaders to think more deeply about their responses while the interpreter is speaking.
Trump and Putin's Phone Call
Regarding the specific phone call between Trump and Putin, it is important to consider the following points:
While Trump may have relied on Putin's instructions in public, private meetings often involve more intimate interactions where language barriers can be minimized. If Trump knew what Putin liked, he might not need an interpreter in private, but it is unlikely that such personal interactions would be conducted in a way that ignores proper diplomatic protocol.Conclusion
Interpreters play a vital role in high-level diplomatic conversations, ensuring that communication is clear and accurate. While the presence of interpreters in private meetings may seem unnecessary given the language proficiency of some leaders, it is a standard practice in diplomacy due to the critical nature of the information being exchanged. The decision to use interpreters is a strategic choice that ensures no information is lost in translation and that both sides fully understand the content of the discussion.