Introduction to Morality in Star Wars

Star Wars, with its vast universe and complex characters, often presents a morally ambiguous world where the lines between good and evil are blurred. This sun-touched galaxy has captured the hearts and minds of fans for decades, but the question of moral extremity among Force Sensitive characters remains a debated topic. In this article, we will explore the nuances of morality within Star Wars and the extremity of Force Sensitive characters.

The Nature of the Force

From a fundamental standpoint, the Force is described as a mystical energy field that binds all living things together. However, it is not inherently moral or immoral. Instead, the distinction between the Light Side and Dark Side is influenced by the actions of its wielders. During the Original Trilogy, characters like Anakin Skywalker (Vader) and the Emperor exemplify the Dark Side, while Luke Skywalker is identified as a Light Sider. However, events in the latter parts of the trilogy challenge this rigid categorization.

Complicated Characters and Moral Ambiguity

Even seemingly clear-cut characters showcase shades of grey. Obi-Wan Kenobi, for example, who is often portrayed as a protector and mentor, shows a less-than-stellar side. His decision to betray his friends and make lethal choices highlights the moral complexity within the Jedi Order. Moreover, his omission of revealing Luke's sister Leia could be seen as a compromise between love and duty.

The Extremism of the Jedi and the Sith

Both the Jedi and the Sith are extremist organizations, with differing but perhaps equivalent approaches to their ends. The Jedi prioritize a detached and calm existence, fearing attachments as a potential source of darkness. Meanwhile, the Sith embrace their relics and the power derived from them, even to the point of making sacrifices to the Force. The prequel trilogy further illustrates these extremes, where disallowing attachments is seen as a broader rule that stifles human nature.

The Problem of Allegiance and "Greater Good"

The belief in the greater good often justifies extreme actions and moral blindness. The Jedi, in their quest to protect the galaxy, may shirk their moral compass. For instance, the Jedienant's readiness to sacrifice countless lives for their affiliation demonstrates the rigidity of their beliefs. On the other hand, the Sith also justify their actions through a twisted interpretation of the same ideal.

The Paradox of Love and the Force

A significant paradox in Star Wars revolves around the idea of love. Jolee Bindo’s statement in Knights of the Old Republic, “Love doesn't lead to the dark side. Passion can lead to rage and fear and can be controlled... but passion is not the same thing as love,” encapsulates a deep truth. Love, rather than being a conduit for darkness, is often what can save individuals from the Dark Side. The Jedi, erroneously fearing love, regard it as a liability that can cloud judgement and lead to attachments.

The Irony of Moral Justifications

The concept of the greater good is inherently ambiguous and can be easily manipulated. Both sides use this idea to justify their extreme actions, leading to an inherently flawed system. The Sith’s use of the Dark Side to achieve power is a stark contrast but ultimately no less conceited and manipulative than the Jedi’s attempts to achieve their goals without attachments.

Conclusion

Star Wars questions the very nature of morality through its complex narrative and rainbow of characters. The extreme actions taken by Force Sensitive characters, whether driven by the Light or Dark Side, challenge the fundamental beliefs of both the Jedi and the Sith. As the saga continues to unfold, the grey areas in morality remain as potent and intriguing as ever.