Reflections on Facepalm Moments in Christian Teaching

The facepalm is a universal expression of disbelief, shame, or exasperation. In the context of Christian teaching, there are several instances where such a gesture might be invoked. One of the most notable involves the treatment of the Torah and the subsequent shift in religious practices over time. This article will delve into controversial aspects of Christian teaching that have led to facepalm moments for many observers.

Mixing the Holy with the Profane: Christmas and Easter

Two examples of facepalm moments in Christian teaching are the mixing of the holy with the profane through the celebration of Christmas and Easter. These events have been imbued with elements that many believe dilute their inherent religious significance. While both Christmas and Easter areondrous and meaningful occasions, their commercial and secular aspects can sometimes overshadow their spiritual importance.

Christmas, centered around the birth of Jesus Christ, has become increasingly associated with holiday shopping, gift-giving, and seasonal festivities. Similarly, Easter, traditionally a solemn and contemplative observance, has evolved to include egg hunting, candy, and other secular activities. This trend towards secularization has prompted many to question the authenticity of these celebrations and the true meaning of the Christian festivals.

The Role of the Law in Christian Teaching

Another significant facepalm moment in Christian teaching involves the treatment of the Torah, or the Law, as recorded in the Old Testament. The teachings of Yeshua Hamashiach and the Apostle Paul have caused some to question the role of the Law in contemporary Christianity.

According to Matthew 5:18, Yeshua stated: "For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished." However, the reference to the renewal of the heavens and the earth in Revelation 21:1 presents a challenge to this viewpoint. The transformation of the heavens and the earth could be interpreted as a sign that the old law has been surpassed by a new covenant.

Apostolic Perspective: A New Covenant

The Apostle Paul adds another layer of complexity in Colossians 2:20-23, where he writes about the "elementary matters" of the world and "dogmas" that may seem wise but are ultimately of no value. These dogmas include the "Do not touch, do not taste, do not handle" commandments, which are seen as self-imposed restrictions with no real religious significance.

Further, in Hebrews 4:9-11, the concept of sabbath-keeping is explored, emphasizing the importance of rest and following the example set by God. This passage suggests that the new covenant brings a new way of Sabbath observance, aligning with the idea of a renewed wo. However, this interpretation is often met with criticism and skepticism.

Historical Context: The Shift from Saturday to Sunday

One of the most controversial issues in Christian teaching involves the change from observing the Sabbath on Saturday to Sunday. This shift has been a subject of much debate and has led many to express exasperation and disbelief.

In Matthew 5:18, Yeshua emphasizes the importance of the Law, but the transformation of the world as described in Revelation 21:1 presents a challenge to this statement. The Council of Laodicea in 364 A.D. decreed that Christians must honor the Lord’s day (Sunday), and this tradition was further solidified by the Roman Papacy.

Cardinal Gibbons, in faith of Our Fathers, admits that the Bible does not authorize the sanctification of Sunday and that the Catholic Church has changed the day from Saturday to Sunday. This shift has often been seen as an overreach of ecclesiastical authority, leading to exasperation among those who hold a literal interpretation of the Bible.

The Role of the Church and its Authority

The Catholic Church's assertion that it has the authority to change the Sabbath to Sunday has been a source of contention. Leaders like Cardinal Gibbons have admitted that the decision to change the day of rest reflects the Church's authority over religious matters. For some, this enforces the belief that the Church has expanded its influence beyond biblical directives.

The challenge posed by these facepalm moments in Christian teaching forces us to question the balance between tradition and biblical interpretation. It also highlights the complex interplay between religious practices and the evolving nature of religious beliefs over time.

Further exploration of these issues is crucial for understanding the diverse perspectives within Christianity and the ongoing debates that shape modern Christian practice.