Self-Diagnosing Mental Illnesses: A Critical Perspective

When one looks up information on mental and personality disorders, they often come across the statement that such conditions require a medical diagnosis. In my personal experience, during my journey to understand the underlying feelings behind my undiagnosed depression, I found this to be particularly true. However, there are many nuances when it comes to self-diagnosis, especially in the complex realm of mental health.

Self-Diagnosis vs. Professional Diagnosis

There are exceptions where mental illnesses can be self-diagnosable, such as conditions like generalized anxiety disorder or social anxiety. However, mental health illnesses like depression, bipolar disorder, and personality disorders are often more complex and require professional evaluation. In my case, I self-diagnosed before receiving an official diagnosis during my first hospital visit in 1969. But, I do not recommend this route.

Although the actual process of diagnosis, even from so-called experts, can be highly subjective and not entirely scientific, it is an important step. Diagnosis is a tool used to control unwanted behaviors through treatment methods which may include neurotoxins and, in some cases, medication without consent. This practice often sets up individuals for stigma and prejudice, which are significant factors to consider when seeking a diagnosis.

Challenges in Self-Analyzing

Self-analyzing mental health conditions is incredibly challenging. Some traits, such as those associated with narcissistic personality disorder, can be inherently blind to the individual. Much of what happens in our brains is unconscious, making it difficult to discern personal flaws or mental health issues. The unconscious biases and behaviors are often invisible to the individual, and it's challenging to infer these things without external observation.

I often experience this with my wife. I can see her flaws clearly, but she cannot see them in herself. Similarly, I can infer my own faults from her reactions to me, yet it remains exceptionally difficult for me to recognize them. This highlights the importance of involving others in the process of self-analysis. However, for mental illnesses and personality disorders, this involvement becomes even more crucial.

Attitudes Toward Self-Diagnosis

Some individuals may engage in self-diagnosis as a way to explain their struggles, gain understanding, and seek help. They may be wrong in their self-diagnosis, but their intentions are usually well-meaning. These individuals are not fetishizing mental illness; they are simply trying to gain clarity and support. It's important to approach such individuals with empathy and support rather than ridicule.

However, there are also groups, such as those described as "omnigender dragonkin" or "SJWs," who might engage in self-diagnosis in a more harmful and self-centered manner. These individuals often focus on personal grievances and can perpetuate a culture of victimhood and entitlement. It's crucial to distinguish between those genuinely seeking support and those spreading harmful narratives.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while self-diagnosis can be a starting point for understanding one's mental health, it is not a substitute for professional evaluation. The accuracy and practical utility of a diagnosis, although subjective, offer important insights and can help manage and improve quality of life. Self-diagnosis should be approached with caution and combined with a willingness to seek professional advice and support.

References

1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Association. 2013.

2. Lilienfeld, S. O., Waldman, I. D. (2016). Invalidity of diagnostic categories and criteria in the DSM-5: Implications for research and practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(2), 4-65.