The Biden Administration and the Failed Bid to Close the Southern Border

The debate over closing the Southern border has been a long-standing issue in U.S. politics. At least four administrations have failed to bring about decisive change, with the current debate stymied by bipartisan disagreements and political stances. This article explores the reasoning behind the failure to close the border, its historical context, and the potential consequences for U.S. policy.

Why Republicans Killed the Bipartisan Border Bill

The main driver behind the failure to enact meaningful border legislation is political rather than policy-based. Republican opposition to the bipartisan border bill was not due to substantive concerns about border security, but rather a strategic move to prop up former President Trump's legacy. By continuing to frame the issue as a national border crisis, Republicans have provided a platform for Trump to campaign and build political support. This strategy highlights the disconnect between real policy needs and political posturing.

President Biden and the Border Policy

President Biden has been criticized for his alleged lack of knowledge and leadership regarding the border policy. However, it is important to note that the policy decisions are often made by a team of advisors and handlers rather than the President himself. While Biden may not deeply understand the intricacies of border policy, the administration's approach is guided by a mix of political strategy and government operational realities. This complex interplay often leads to a less-than-perfect public understanding of the policy at hand.

Controversies and Myths Surrounding Border Closure

There are several misconceptions and myths surrounding the idea of closing the border, including the constitutional authority to do so. According to the U.S. Constitution, the only provision for closing borders is in times of national emergencies such as war declarations or epidemics. Therefore, the notion of indefinitely closing the border under current circumstances is legally dubious.

Further, the idea that closing the border would completely halt all travel and trade is also inaccurate. The current situation involves more complex policies aimed at managing immigration flows and ensuring national security, rather than an absolute closure. It is worth noting that a complete border closure would have severe economic and trade implications, especially with nations like Mexico and Canada.

American Immigration History and the Future of Policy

The history of American immigration is marked by a long history of both welcome and rejection of immigrants. Throughout our nation's history, various groups, often based on prejudice and misinformation, have vehemently opposed immigration. However, the very fabric of America is built on the idea of open borders and the freedom to migrate. By keeping the borders open, the United States has integrated a diverse population, contributing to its economic and cultural vibrancy.

To address real concerns about immigration, the article suggests a more practical approach: making all current American citizens pass the U.S. Citizenship Test as a condition for permanent residency. This would ensure that immigrants have a foundational understanding of their country and its values, fostering a sense of shared responsibility and belonging. Additionally, this approach could help in identifying and deporting those who lack the necessary civic knowledge, focusing on the integration of immigrants rather than the enforcement of strict border controls.

Ultimately, the debate over border policy must move beyond partisan claims and focus on practical, ethically sound solutions that safeguard the interests of both the nation and its people. The Biden administration and its supporters should continue to push for comprehensive legislative measures that address the underlying issues of border security, while also ensuring that America remains a beacon of opportunity and freedom for all.