The Biden Administration’s Border Crisis and Its Impact on America

In recent times, the Biden administration has faced increasing criticism over its handling of the border crisis, where unvetted and unvaccinated immigrants continue to surge across the borders into the United States, overwhelming both officials and border communities. This article delves into the reasons behind the decision to cancel all border wall contracts, the analogy to the We Were Soldiers film, and the broader implications of the open border situation for America.

The Decision to Cancel Border Wall Contracts

President Joe Biden has taken a decisive stance on the border crisis by canceling all contracts for the construction of border walls, a move that has stirred controversy and debate. This decision reflects a strategy to address the immediate crisis by focusing on other measures, such as increasing border security and processing asylum requests more efficiently.

By canceling these contracts, the Biden administration aims to redirect funds and resources towards addressing the surge of unvetted and unvaccinated immigrants. However, this policy has attracted criticism from those who argue that the absence of a physical barrier leaves the country vulnerable to illegal immigration and more crime.

The Urgency of Addressing the Border Crisis

The surge in migrant numbers has caused significant strain on both border communities and federal agencies. The lack of a vetting process and the absence of vaccinations among many of these individuals pose serious public safety concerns. Furthermore, the ongoing border crisis highlights the broader societal issues at play, including cultural shifts and increased crime rates.

Analogy to the Vietnam War and We Were Soldiers

It is important to recognize the parallels between the current border crisis and the situation faced by Col. Hal Moore during the Vietnam War film, We Were Soldiers. In that scene, Moore had to make a difficult decision to call in air and artillery support, knowing that it would potentially result in the death of his own men but ultimately securing their survival and success in the battle.

Brandon and the leftists driving immigration policies today are like those who acted in We Were Soldiers. They prioritize their goals and ideologies over the well-being and security of the United States. However, where Moore’s actions were justified by the need to protect his troops and achieve military objectives, the actions of the current administration are seen as deliberately putting Americans at risk to further political agendas.

Implications and Continual Criticism

The decisions made by the Biden administration have significant implications for American society and governance. Critics argue that the administration is working in lockstep with left-wing ideologies, prioritizing the survival of their political movement over the well-being of the American people. The open border policy is seen as an act of war against the traditional values and institutions of the United States.

The administration’s reluctance to reinstate border controls and address the surge in illegal immigration has led to increased crime rates, public safety concerns, and financial burdens on the government. The ongoing crisis highlights the challenges in maintaining a balance between political ideology and practical governance.

Conclusion

The current border crisis under the Biden administration represents more than just a policy debate. It is a reflection of deeper ideological divides and a challenge to the traditional structures of American society. As the situation continues to unfold, it is crucial for citizens to hold their leaders accountable and demand policies that protect national security and public safety.

While much of the discussion and criticism remain in the realm of political discourse, the long-term impacts of the open border situation will be felt by every American. Only time will tell whether the administration’s approach will prove to be a strategic move or a costly mistake.