The Significance of Wigs Worn by Barristers and Judges in British Courts

The wigs donned by barristers and judges in British courts carry profound historical and cultural significance, reflecting their roles and responsibilities within the legal system. This article explores the historical, cultural, and symbolic significance of wigs, delves into the variety and meanings of different styles, and addresses the relevance of this tradition in the modern context.

Historical Significance

Tradition: The practice of wearing wigs in the legal profession dates back to the 17th century when it became a fashion among the aristocracy. This tradition was adopted by the legal system, symbolizing the formality and seriousness of law.

Uniformity: Wigs create a sense of uniformity among legal professionals, reinforcing the idea of impartiality and equality before the law. They help distinguish judges and barristers from the general public.

Symbols and Meanings

Authority and Respect: Wearing a wig conveys a sense of authority and respect for the legal profession. It signifies the weight of the law and the solemnity of court proceedings.

Anonymity: Wigs can anonymize the wearer, emphasizing the role of the office rather than the individual. This ensures that judgments are based on law and evidence rather than personal attributes.

Varied Styles of Wigs

Barristers’ Wigs: Typically, barristers wear a white curly wig, often referred to as a curly or martial wig. This style is a symbol of their profession, denoting their role as advocates in court.

Judges’ Wigs: Judges often wear more elaborate versions, which can include additional features like a longer tail. The style may vary based on the level of court, such as High Court judges versus lower courts. For example, judges in criminal courts might wear different styles compared to those in civil courts.

Modern Context

While wigs remain in many courts, there has been ongoing debate about their relevance in contemporary society. Some argue that they are outdated and do not reflect modern values. Others believe they are an essential part of legal tradition.

Outdated Arguend: Those who argue against the continued use of wigs argue that they are outdated, potentially alienating both the public and participants in the legal process. They suggest that modern attire could make the legal system more accessible and relatable.

Traditional Advocates: On the other hand, traditional advocates argue that wigs symbolize the respect and dignity of the legal system. They believe that these wigs reinforce the impartiality and integrity of the judiciary, emphasizing that judgments are based on law and evidence rather than personal attributes.

In Summary

Wigs worn by barristers and judges in British courts symbolize tradition, authority, and the impartiality of the legal system. Different styles denote rank and role within the legal system, ensuring a clear visual distinction and reinforcing the values of the profession.

The debate over their continued use highlights the tension between tradition and modernity in the legal world, challenging us to consider how to preserve the rich history of our legal institutions while making them more accessible to all.