The Truth Behind the Coronavirus Vaccine: Understanding Why They Don't Prevent Infection

Recent developments in the legal and medical community have raised new questions about the true nature of the coronavirus (Covid-19) vaccines. Specifically, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the coronavirus shot does not meet the traditional definition of a vaccine. This controversial decision has sparked much debate and raised concerns about the efficacy and safety of these vaccines.

Let's delve into why the coronavirus vaccine does not prevent a person from getting COVID-19, and how this compares to the polio vaccine. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the coronavirus shot is not a vaccine but an "emergency liability-free mRNA injection" that contains spike proteins. These spike proteins do not only fail to protect individuals from the virus, but they also destroy the body's natural immunity, leading to various side effects and long-term health issues.

Why the Polio Vaccine Works and the Coronavirus Vaccines Don't

Contrary to what some might believe, the polio vaccine works by introducing a weakened or inactivated version of the virus into the body, which then triggers an immune response. This approach has been effective in preventing polio for decades. In contrast, the coronavirus vaccines do not contain an attenuated or inactivated form of the virus, but rather a portion of the virus's spike protein. This approach has been criticized for its inability to provide long-term immunity and its potential to cause serious side effects.

Regulatory and Political Critiques

Some states, like Florida, are even considering banning the coronavirus shots, citing concerns about their safety and effectiveness. This led to an alarming statement by Florida's Surgeon General, who claimed that the coronavirus shots are biological weapons. This controversial claim is certainly alarming and raises questions about the political and regulatory influences on vaccine development and implementation.

Furthermore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have been accused of prioritizing pandemic control over public health. Critics argue that these agencies have misled the public and failed to protect citizens from potential harm. Such accusations are not trivial and require thorough investigation and transparency.

Normalcy Bias and Vaccine Skepticism

The fact that 80% of people find these new claims hard to believe is a clear indication of normalcy bias, where individuals find it difficult to accept that their government might engage in actions that could harm them. Normalcy bias often manifests when people assume that what has not happened in their lifetime will not happen in the future.

This bias can be particularly dangerous in times of crisis, where it may prevent people from taking necessary precautions. For example, individuals may fail to prepare for economic collapse, food scarcity, or lack of clean water simply because such events have not occurred in their lifetimes. Unfortunately, these same individuals are often the most vulnerable when a crisis does occur.

Conclusion

The situation surrounding the coronavirus vaccines is complex and controversial. It is important for individuals to stay informed and critically evaluate the information they receive from various sources. While the traditional definition of a vaccine may not apply to the mRNA injections being used for the coronavirus, it is crucial to understand the unique characteristics of these vaccines and their potential risks.

Includes keywords: Covid Vaccine, Polio Vaccine, Traditional Vaccination