HealthHub

Location:HOME > Health > content

Health

Understanding the Human Right of the Unborn: Why Abortion Under 24 Weeks Cant Be Justified as Murder

January 10, 2025Health3549
Understanding the Human Right of the Unborn: Why Abortion Under 24 Wee

Understanding the Human Right of the Unborn: Why Abortion Under 24 Weeks Can't Be Justified as Murder

It is a verifiable fact that a foetus is a human life - an unborn child with its own unique DNA, heartbeat, and fingerprints. Far from being something less than human, the developing fetus is fully human, from the moment of conception in the womb, up until birth and beyond. The assertion that a foetus is not a human being is a dangerous lie that seeks to dehumanize and eliminate the rights and value of the unborn. This article aims to shed light on the scientific reality of fetal development and the ethical implications of disregarding these rights.

The Unborn is Human

The developing fetus is not a puppy or a giraffe; it is a human being. To deny this is to ignore the undeniable truths of science. Every person who has ever lived started as a fetus and eventually grew into a fully-fledged human. The law agrees, as the killing of a pregnant woman is considered murder twice over.

The term "unborn" is a misnomer, as it implies the absence of human qualities. A fetus, by definition, is a fully human organism, albeit not yet born. Even critical rights such as the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness apply to the unborn. Recognizing the fetal human rights would align with the moral and legal framework that protects all members of the human community.

Misconceptions and Misunderstandings

Some individuals attribute human status to irrelevant attributes or assume that an embryo is immediately conscious upon conception. These misconceptions are sheer science denial. For example, fingerprints do not define humanity; many animals share these characteristics, and some humans have identical fingerprints. Similarly, a fetal heartbeat is misleading. At six weeks, the phenomenon called "fetal heartbeat" is not yet a true heartbeat because the embryo does not have a heart. The heart, important as it is, is merely an organ; it does not make the fetus more human just by developing features.

The neurological system takes a long time to develop properly. Brain activity akin to that in an outside world only develops around the 24-25 week mark, far later than most abortions are performed. As of now, the vast majority of abortions occur before the 13th week, with the exception of emergencies. Far from a developed consciousness, the fetus is still in the process of becoming a fully conscious being.

The Ethical and Legal Implications

Denying the human rights of the unborn not only violates ethical principles but also the law. Conceiving a person as something less than human serves to dehumanize not only the fetus but also those who contribute to its death. This dehumanizing tendency is repulsive and can have profound negative impacts on society as a whole.

Parents derive their humanity from their birth rights, and the unborn child is no different. Women, too, are more than simply carriers of children. They have rights, aspirations, and lives that are meaningful in their own right. The earplugging and denial of facts is a disservice to both the unborn and the women who carry them.

Conclusion

The unborn are fully human. They have their own DNA, heartbeat, and fingerprints, and deserve the full protection and rights of human life. Abortion under 24 weeks cannot be justified as murder because the fetus is not a fully formed person with complete autonomy. Recognizing the human rights of the unborn is essential for upholding justice and moral integrity in our society. It is time to acknowledge the undeniable truth and uphold the rights of the unborn.