Why Democrats Should Avoid Hurrying the Confirmation of SCOTUS Nominee

When addressing the potential rush by Democrats to confirm President Biden's Supreme Court nominee, it is important to consider several factors. The Democrats are in a position where their majority is quite fragile and could erode at any moment. In this context, rushing the confirmation process may not be the best strategy for them. Here, we will explore why Democrats should avoid hurrying the confirmation, especially considering the upcoming midterm elections and the need for a thorough vetting process.

The Fragile Majority

The Democratic majority in the Senate is not as strong as it may appear. Should they lose even a few seats during the upcoming midterm elections, they could find themselves in a weaker position, making it difficult to pass critical legislation, including any judicial nominations. Rushing the confirmation now may jeopardize their position further, particularly if the nominee is met with significant backlash or controversy.

Timing and Coaching the Narrative

The Democrats have less than 282 days before the midterm elections, and the confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee will be a significant part of the political narrative. Delaying the confirmation until closer to the elections could help in building a positive narrative around their efforts to maintain judicial independence and effectiveness. Republicans are likely to support a swift confirmation to prevent any potential political backlash they might experience.

The Importance of a Robust Nomination Process

Justice Breyer’s retirement provides the opportunity to appoint a justice who will bring a fresh perspective to the Supreme Court. However, this requires a thorough vetting process. The Democrats should ensure that the nominee is well-prepared, well-qualified, and represents diverse perspectives without any skeletons in their closet. A rushed confirmation could backfire, as potential skeletons in the closet could emerge and be seized upon by political opponents. It is crucial to take the time to properly investigate the nominee's background and track record.

Strategic Considerations and Midterm Elections

The Democrats should avoid playing a 'race-gender' card as this may not always be the best strategy for ensuring the best candidate is chosen. While appointing a Black female justice is an admirable goal, it should not come at the expense of thorough vetting and ensuring that the nominee has a strong record and a balanced approach. Haste can lead to poor decisions, which could have long-term consequences for the Court and the party.

Future Needs and the Full Complement of Justices

Even if Justice Breyer continues for a few more months, it makes practical sense to have his replacement ready. The Supreme Court functions better with a full complement of nine justices. Having a succession plan in place ensures continuity and stability in the Court, which is vital for the administration of justice. This strategic move can also demonstrate the Democrats' commitment to judicial independence and competence.

Conclusion

Instead of rushing the confirmation process, Democrats should prioritize a comprehensive vetting process and ensure that the nominee meets the highest standards. This approach not only protects the party's interests but also upholds the integrity of the judicial system. By taking the necessary time, the Democrats can solidify their position and ensure that the nominee is well-prepared to serve on the Supreme Court. Delaying the confirmation until a more opportune time, such as close to the November election, can help in building a more favorable political narrative for the Democrats.

Keyword: Democrats, SCOTUS confirmation, midterm elections

[It’s 282 days and counting to the 2022 midterms] (Calculate Duration Between Two Dates)